<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The folly of free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://james.wanless.info/2009/01/the-folly-of-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://james.wanless.info/2009/01/the-folly-of-free/</link>
	<description>designer :: collaborative technologist :: endorphin junkie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:53:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://james.wanless.info/2009/01/the-folly-of-free/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.wanless.info/?p=597#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tony.  I got so caught up in factoring in the business realities that I didn&#039;t touch enought on the very important point you&#039;ve made.

The value of our own intellectual property and giving some piece of it away to pay for free apps is all the rage with social media and cloud computing gaining so much traction.

The price is actually pretty high and, as you&#039;ve so eloquently stated, people only think of the dollars and cents.  

Even with a user fee and commitment to complete data privacy, would there be any guarantee that Google, Facebook or Twitter still wouldn&#039;t leverage your data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tony.  I got so caught up in factoring in the business realities that I didn&#8217;t touch enought on the very important point you&#8217;ve made.</p>
<p>The value of our own intellectual property and giving some piece of it away to pay for free apps is all the rage with social media and cloud computing gaining so much traction.</p>
<p>The price is actually pretty high and, as you&#8217;ve so eloquently stated, people only think of the dollars and cents.  </p>
<p>Even with a user fee and commitment to complete data privacy, would there be any guarantee that Google, Facebook or Twitter still wouldn&#8217;t leverage your data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Wanless</title>
		<link>http://james.wanless.info/2009/01/the-folly-of-free/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Wanless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.wanless.info/?p=597#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>Hey James:
As I&#039;ve said often, it&#039;s immutable: the value of free (to users) rapidly becomes zero. To providers, it&#039;s in the negative, because they incur costs. 

Social sharing aside, it&#039;s human nature to believe that if something is free, its value is very low. If a price tag is put on it, it increases the value because it has provided a measure.  

Yes, the great mass expects free. But increasingly, segments are recognizing that it&#039;s not really free. Your information has a value, as does your attention (for marketing purposes). 

I think many will start calculating when seeking out specific information -- not what Paris Hilton did or said yesterday, but real information. And they&#039;ll recognize that a modest price is in fact cheaper than &quot;free&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey James:<br />
As I&#8217;ve said often, it&#8217;s immutable: the value of free (to users) rapidly becomes zero. To providers, it&#8217;s in the negative, because they incur costs. </p>
<p>Social sharing aside, it&#8217;s human nature to believe that if something is free, its value is very low. If a price tag is put on it, it increases the value because it has provided a measure.  </p>
<p>Yes, the great mass expects free. But increasingly, segments are recognizing that it&#8217;s not really free. Your information has a value, as does your attention (for marketing purposes). </p>
<p>I think many will start calculating when seeking out specific information &#8212; not what Paris Hilton did or said yesterday, but real information. And they&#8217;ll recognize that a modest price is in fact cheaper than &#8220;free&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Much Money Does It Cost To Open A Bar &#124; Provencialsofa</title>
		<link>http://james.wanless.info/2009/01/the-folly-of-free/#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>How Much Money Does It Cost To Open A Bar &#124; Provencialsofa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://james.wanless.info/?p=597#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
